Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs GeForce 8800M GTX SLI

Place in performance ranking	848	191
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.31	6.19
Architecture	G9x (2007−2010)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	NB8E-GTX	N19E-Q1
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	19 November 2007 (16 years ago)	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	$149	$2393

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3000 Mobile has 1897% better value for money than 8800M GTX SLI.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	1920
Core clock speed	500 MHz	945 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1380 MHz
Number of transistors	1508 Million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	80 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	198.7

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	No outputs
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	no data	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8800M GTX SLI 1.98

RTX 3000 Mobile 26.12
+1219%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms GeForce 8800M GTX SLI by 1219% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

8800M GTX SLI 6326

RTX 3000 Mobile 50309
+695%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms GeForce 8800M GTX SLI by 695% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	7−8 −1257%	95 +1257%
4K	6−7 −1367%	88 +1367%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−760%

40−45
+760%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −3750%	77 +3750%
Battlefield 5	2−3 −4100%	80−85 +4100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −527%	65−70 +527%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −760%	40−45 +760%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −6700%	65−70 +6700%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −9000%	91 +9000%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −2800%	85−90 +2800%
Hitman 3	3−4 −2533%	75−80 +2533%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −1767%	55−60 +1767%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −740%	40−45 +740%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −1150%	100 +1150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −3000%	62 +3000%
Battlefield 5	2−3 −4100%	80−85 +4100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −527%	65−70 +527%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −760%	40−45 +760%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −6700%	65−70 +6700%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −8500%	86 +8500%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −2800%	85−90 +2800%
Hitman 3	3−4 −2533%	75−80 +2533%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −1767%	55−60 +1767%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −1367%	40−45 +1367%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −740%	40−45 +740%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −950%	84 +950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −2080%	109 +2080%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −1850%	39 +1850%
Battlefield 5	2−3 −4100%	80−85 +4100%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −760%	40−45 +760%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −6700%	65−70 +6700%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −7600%	77 +7600%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −2800%	85−90 +2800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −1020%	56 +1020%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Hitman 3	5−6 −780%	40−45 +780%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −289%	35−40 +289%
Metro Exodus	0−1	24−27
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1900%	20−22 +1900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −600%	35−40 +600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1600%	16−18 +1600%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1400%	45−50 +1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −1500%	30−35 +1500%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Hitman 3	2−3 −1150%	24−27 +1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −143%	16−18 +143%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1600%	16−18 +1600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	14−16
Far Cry 5	3−4 −633%	21−24 +633%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −420%	24−27 +420%

This is how 8800M GTX SLI and RTX 3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3000 Mobile is 1257% faster than 8800M GTX SLI in 1080p
RTX 3000 Mobile is 1367% faster than 8800M GTX SLI in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3000 Mobile is 9000% faster than the 8800M GTX SLI.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 3000 Mobile surpassed 8800M GTX SLI in all 47 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	1.98	26.12
Recency	19 November 2007	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	6 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	80 Watt