ATI Radeon 9700 PRO vs GeForce 8400M G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8400M G with Radeon 9700 PRO, including specs and performance data.

8400M G
2007
256 MB GDDR3, 10 Watt
0.25
+92.3%

8400M G outperforms 9700 PRO by an impressive 92% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14281498
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.93no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameG86R300
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speed400 MHz325 MHz
Number of transistors210 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Wattno data
Texture fill rate3.2002.600
Floating-point processing power0.0128 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs88
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneFloppy

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz310 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s19.84 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8400M G 0.25
+92.3%
ATI 9700 PRO 0.13

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8400M G 105
+98.1%
Samples: 97
ATI 9700 PRO 53
Samples: 10

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Valorant 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Valorant 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Valorant 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Valorant 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 0.13
Recency 9 May 2007 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 150 nm

8400M G has a 92% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 88% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce 8400M G is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9700 PRO in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8400M G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9700 PRO is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 21 votes

Rate Radeon 9700 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400M G or Radeon 9700 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.