ATI FirePro V9800P vs GeForce 8400M G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1428not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.93no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameG86Cypress
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)9 September 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81600
Core clock speed400 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors210 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20068.00
Floating-point processing power0.0128 TFLOPS2.72 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs880
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cache16 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s147.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 9 September 2010
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 225 Watt

8400M G has 2150% lower power consumption.

ATI V9800P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400M G and FirePro V9800P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400M G is a notebook graphics card while FirePro V9800P is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro V9800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400M G or FirePro V9800P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.