ATI Radeon 9700 PRO vs GeForce 8700M GT SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8700M GT SLI with Radeon 9700 PRO, including specs and performance data.

8700M GT SLI
2007
1 GB GDDR3, 58 Watt
0.73
+462%

8700M SLI outperforms 9700 PRO by a whopping 462% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12231498
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.97no data
ArchitectureG8x (2007)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameNB8E-SER300
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 September 2007 (18 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64no data
Core clock speed625 MHz325 MHz
Number of transistors578 Million110 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)58 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data2.600
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataFloppy

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz310 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data19.84 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX109.0 (9_0)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Valorant 27−30
+480%
5−6
−480%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Valorant 27−30
+480%
5−6
−480%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Valorant 27−30
+480%
5−6
−480%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

1440p
Ultra

Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Valorant 4−5 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.73 0.13
Recency 18 September 2007 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 150 nm

8700M GT SLI has a 462% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 88% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce 8700M GT SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9700 PRO in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8700M GT SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9700 PRO is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate GeForce 8700M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 21 votes

Rate Radeon 9700 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8700M GT SLI or Radeon 9700 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.