GRID K340 vs GeForce 820M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 820M with GRID K340, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 820M
2013
1 GB DDR3, 15 Watt
1.14

K340 outperforms 820M by a whopping 152% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1105816
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.02
Power efficiency5.860.98
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGF117GK107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date27 November 2013 (12 years ago)23 July 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96384 ×4
Core clock speed625 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistors585 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate10.0030.40 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS0.7296 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs88 ×4
TMUs1632 ×4
L1 Cache128 KB32 KB
L2 Cache128 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB ×4
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed900 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s28.8 GB/s ×4
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA+3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
−150%
40−45
+150%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data82.48

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Fortnite 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Valorant 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−141%
65−70
+141%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Dota 2 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Fortnite 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Valorant 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Dota 2 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Valorant 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Valorant 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Valorant 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

This is how GeForce 820M and GRID K340 compete in popular games:

  • GRID K340 is 150% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.14 2.87
Recency 27 November 2013 23 July 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 225 Watt

GeForce 820M has an age advantage of 4 months, and 1400% lower power consumption.

GRID K340, on the other hand, has a 151.8% higher aggregate performance score.

The GRID K340 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 820M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 820M is a notebook graphics card while GRID K340 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GeForce 820M
NVIDIA GRID K340
GRID K340

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 936 votes

Rate GeForce 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate GRID K340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 820M or GRID K340, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.