GeForce 820M: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregated performance score

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 1.29% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 4090.

RTX 4090GeForce RTX4090
Compare

Summary

NVIDIA started GeForce 820M sales 7 January 2014. This is a Fermi architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use. 2 GB of DDR3 memory clocked at 1.8 GHz are supplied, and together with 64 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 14.4 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via PCIe 2.0 x16 interface. Power consumption is at 15 Watt.

General info

Some basic facts about GeForce 820M: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in performance ranking991
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Value for money0.03
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameN15V-GM
Market segmentLaptop
Release date7 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Current price$490 of 168889 (A100 PCIe 80 GB)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Technical specs

GeForce 820M's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce 820M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)
Core clock speed775 MHzof 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Number of transistors585 millionof 14400 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology28 nmof 4 (Radeon 780M)
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattof 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate10.00of 969.9 (H100 SXM5 96 GB)
Floating-point performance240.0 gflopsof 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo)

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce 820M's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on GeForce 820M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory typeDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GBof 192 (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Memory bus width64 Bitof 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed1800 MHzof 23000 (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER)
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sof 3276 (Aldebaran)
Shared memory-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce 820M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by GeForce 820M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0
Optimus+
GameWorks+

API support

APIs supported by GeForce 820M, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.1
OpenGL4.5of 4.6 (GeForce RTX 4090)
OpenCL1.1
VulkanN/A
CUDA+

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of GeForce 820M. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 820M 1.29

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce 820M 499

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce 820M 5106

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce 820M 1267

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce 820M 897

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GeForce 820M 6074

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GeForce 820M 2736

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GeForce 820M 7

Gaming performance

Let's see how good GeForce 820M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD16

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
Forza Horizon 4 0−1
Hitman 3 1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
Forza Horizon 4 0−1
Hitman 3 1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
Metro Exodus 2−3
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
Forza Horizon 4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
Hitman 3 4−5
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
Far Cry 5 2−3
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
Hitman 3 1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6

Relative performance

Overall GeForce 820M performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook video cards.


AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to GeForce 820M is Radeon HD 6540G2, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our ranking.

HD 6540G2Radeon HD6540G2
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce 820M:

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

HD 6540G2Radeon HD6540G2
Compare
R7 M260Radeon R7M260
Compare
R5 M420Radeon R5M420
Compare
HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual GraphicsRadeon HD6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
Compare
HD 6510G2Radeon HD6510G2
Compare
R5 (Stoney Ridge)Radeon R5(Stoney Ridge)
Compare

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with GeForce 820M according to our statistics.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


3.1 743 votes

Rate GeForce 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about GeForce 820M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.