RTX 4090 vs 810M

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

GeForce 810M
1.04

RTX 4090 outperforms 810M by 9515% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking10571
Place by popularitynot in top-1007
Value for money0.0110.69
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameGF117AD102-300-A1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date24 March 2014 (10 years old)20 September 2022 (1 year old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599
Current price$163 $1756 (1.1x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4090 has 106800% better value for money than GeForce 810M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4816384
Core clock speed738 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors585 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate5.9041,290
Floating-point performance141.7 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
WidthMXM Module3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount1 GB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s1,008 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.18.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 810M 1.04
RTX 4090 100.00
+9515%

RTX 4090 outperforms 810M by 9515% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce 810M 404
RTX 4090 38762
+9495%

RTX 4090 outperforms 810M by 9495% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−13150%
265
+13150%
1440p2−3
−10500%
212
+10500%
4K1−2
−14900%
150
+14900%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.04 100.00
Recency 24 March 2014 20 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 450 Watt

The GeForce RTX 4090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 810M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 810M
GeForce 810M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 4090

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 474 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce 810M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 10630 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.