ATI All-In-Wonder X600 vs GeForce 720A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking953not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.34no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameGF117RV370
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 July 2014 (10 years ago)1 July 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed775 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed938 MHzno data
Number of transistors585 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Wattno data
Texture fill rate15.011.600
Floating-point processing power0.1801 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s9.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2014 1 July 2005
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm

GeForce 720A has an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 720A and All-In-Wonder X600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 720A is a notebook card while All-In-Wonder X600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 720A
GeForce 720A
ATI All-In-Wonder X600
All-In-Wonder X600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 6 votes

Rate GeForce 720A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder X600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.