Radeon 760M vs GeForce 705A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated352
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)RDNA 3 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGF119Phoenix
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2013 (10 years ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48512
Core clock speed738 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2800 MHz
Number of transistors292 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate5.90467.20
Floating-point performance0.1417 gflops4.301 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2013 5 January 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 54 Watt

GeForce 705A has 260% lower power consumption.

Radeon 760M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 705A and Radeon 760M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 705A is a desktop card while Radeon 760M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 705A
GeForce 705A
AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate GeForce 705A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 142 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.