GeForce RTX 3070 vs 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 320M with GeForce RTX 3070, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 320M
2010
23 Watt
0.54

RTX 3070 outperforms GeForce 320M by a whopping 10637% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking118531
Place by popularitynot in top-10044
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data25.99
ArchitectureGT2xx (2009−2012)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameMCP89Ampere GA104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2010 (14 years ago)16 September 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GeForce 320M and RTX 3070 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores325888
Core clock speed450 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1725 MHz
Number of transistors486 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200317.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 320M and GeForce RTX 3070 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDAno data8.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 320M 0.54
RTX 3070 57.98
+10637%

RTX 3070 outperforms 320M by 10637% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce 320M 209
RTX 3070 22380
+10608%

RTX 3070 outperforms 320M by 10608% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GeForce 320M 1852
RTX 3070 88744
+4692%

RTX 3070 outperforms 320M by 4692% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−1023%
146
+1023%
1440p0−198
4K0−164

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4800%
147
+4800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−3025%
125
+3025%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3533%
100−110
+3533%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4533%
139
+4533%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−13900%
140−150
+13900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2080%
109
+2080%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−2100%
220−230
+2100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−3783%
230−240
+3783%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−480%
174
+480%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3533%
100−110
+3533%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4100%
126
+4100%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−13900%
140−150
+13900%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2220%
116
+2220%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−2100%
220−230
+2100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−4150%
255
+4150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1110%
120−130
+1110%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−493%
178
+493%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1925%
81
+1925%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3533%
100−110
+3533%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3300%
102
+3300%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2120%
111
+2120%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−1710%
181
+1710%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−3617%
223
+3617%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1110%
121
+1110%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−183%
85
+183%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 68
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6100%
62
+6100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−6700%
65−70
+6700%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1500%
96
+1500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−4767%
146
+4767%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−17400%
175
+17400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3700%
114
+3700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−4700%
48
+4700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 43

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3350%
69
+3350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100
+0%
100
+0%
Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 118
+0%
118
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 87
+0%
87
+0%
Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 78
+0%
78
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 116
+0%
116
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65
+0%
65
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 101
+0%
101
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 166
+0%
166
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hitman 3 52
+0%
52
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 107
+0%
107
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
+0%
90
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 97
+0%
97
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 38
+0%
38
+0%

This is how GeForce 320M and RTX 3070 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 is 1023% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3070 is 17400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 is ahead in 35 tests (50%)
  • there's a draw in 35 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.54 57.98
Recency 1 April 2010 16 September 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 220 Watt

GeForce 320M has 856.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070, on the other hand, has a 10637% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 320M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 320M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3070 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GeForce 320M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 51 vote

Rate GeForce 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 10126 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.