RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs ATI GameCube GPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 5 (2000)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameFlipperAD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date24 August 2000 (24 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3072
Core clock speed162 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2010 MHz
Number of transistors51 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate0.65193.0
Floating-point processing powerno data12.35 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs496
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed162 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.296 GB/s256.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.0+12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 August 2000 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 50 Watt

ATI GameCube GPU has 11.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 22 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GameCube GPU and RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GameCube GPU is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI GameCube GPU
GameCube GPU
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 31 vote

Rate GameCube GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.