Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GRID M40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID M40 and Radeon Pro WX 3200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GRID M40
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
4.26

Pro WX 3200 outperforms GRID M40 by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking640546
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.403.23
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code nameGM107Polaris 12
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date18 May 2016 (8 years ago)26 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199
Current price$484 $740 (3.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro WX 3200 has 708% better value for money than GRID M40.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384640
Core clock speed1033 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate33.0641.44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Width2-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5200 MHz6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA5.0no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
−58.3%
19
+58.3%
4K5−6
−60%
8
+60%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Hitman 3 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 24
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Hitman 3 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 7
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−40%
21−24
+40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−40%
14−16
+40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Hitman 3 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hitman 3 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−40%
7−8
+40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%

This is how GRID M40 and Pro WX 3200 compete in popular games:

  • Pro WX 3200 is 58% faster in 1080p
  • Pro WX 3200 is 60% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.26 6.30
Recency 18 May 2016 26 September 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 65 Watt

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID M40 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID M40
GRID M40
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 3 votes

Rate GRID M40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 76 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.