Radeon Sky 500 vs GRID M3-3020

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID M3-3020 and Radeon Sky 500, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GRID M3-3020
2016
4 GB GDDR5
7.07

Sky 500 outperforms M3-3020 by an impressive 60% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking591458
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.78
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGM107Pitcairn
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date18 May 2016 (9 years ago)27 March 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401280
Core clock speed1033 MHz950 MHz
Boost clock speed1306 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rate52.2476.00
Floating-point processing power1.672 TFLOPS2.432 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4080
L1 Cache320 KB320 KB
L2 Cache2 MB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm242 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/s154 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort countno data1
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA5.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.07 11.29
Recency 18 May 2016 27 March 2013

GRID M3-3020 has an age advantage of 3 years.

Sky 500, on the other hand, has a 59.7% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon Sky 500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID M3-3020 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
GRID M3-3020
AMD Radeon Sky 500
Radeon Sky 500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GRID M3-3020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 15 votes

Rate Radeon Sky 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID M3-3020 or Radeon Sky 500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.