Radeon 780M vs GRID M3-3020

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GRID M3-3020
2016
4 GB GDDR5
7.65

Radeon 780M outperforms GRID M3-3020 by a whopping 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking494283
Place by popularitynot in top-10057
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)RDNA 3
GPU code nameGM107Phoenix
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 May 2016 (8 years ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640768
Core clock speed1033 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1306 MHz3000 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate52.24139.2
Floating-point performance1,672 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GRID M3-3020 and Radeon 780M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed5200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.0no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−157%
36
+157%
1440p8−9
−163%
21
+163%
4K5−6
−180%
14
+180%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−144%
39
+144%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−157%
35−40
+157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−158%
30−35
+158%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−164%
35−40
+164%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−158%
31
+158%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−169%
40−45
+169%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−172%
45−50
+172%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−140%
80−85
+140%
Hitman 3 14−16
−157%
35−40
+157%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−143%
97
+143%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−154%
60−65
+154%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−143%
50−55
+143%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−167%
64
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−156%
41
+156%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−157%
35−40
+157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−158%
30−35
+158%
Battlefield 5 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−164%
35−40
+164%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−140%
24
+140%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−169%
40−45
+169%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−172%
45−50
+172%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−140%
80−85
+140%
Hitman 3 14−16
−157%
35−40
+157%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−143%
70−75
+143%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−163%
21
+163%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−143%
50−55
+143%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−152%
53
+152%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−156%
46
+156%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−167%
55−60
+167%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−157%
35−40
+157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−158%
30−35
+158%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−164%
35−40
+164%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−156%
23
+156%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−169%
40−45
+169%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−140%
80−85
+140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−152%
53
+152%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−156%
46
+156%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−142%
29
+142%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−157%
18
+157%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−143%
50−55
+143%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−157%
35−40
+157%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−171%
18−20
+171%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−156%
21−24
+156%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−170%
27
+170%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−157%
35−40
+157%
Hitman 3 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−164%
35−40
+164%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−143%
30−35
+143%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−167%
32
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−150%
20
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Hitman 3 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−150%
20−22
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−150%
15
+150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−150%
24−27
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−150%
20−22
+150%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−143%
16−18
+143%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%

This is how GRID M3-3020 and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 780M is 157% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 780M is 163% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 780M is 180% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.65 18.35
Recency 18 May 2016 5 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm

The Radeon 780M is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID M3-3020 in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID M3-3020 is a workstation card while Radeon 780M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
GRID M3-3020
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GRID M3-3020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1073 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.