GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs GRID M3-3020

GRID M3-3020 NVS 810 Quadro K620 Quadro K1200 Quadro K2200 Tesla M10
VS
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID M3-3020 with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GRID M3-3020
2016
4 GB GDDR5
7.69

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms GRID M3-3020 by a whopping 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking526274
Place by popularitynot in top-10062
Power efficiencyno data27.92
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM107TU116
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 May 2016 (8 years ago)23 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401024
Core clock speed1033 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed1306 MHz1485 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate52.2495.04
Floating-point processing power1.672 TFLOPS3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.140
CUDA5.07.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−181%
59
+181%
1440p16−18
−169%
43
+169%
4K9−10
−178%
25
+178%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+0%
59
+0%
Elden Ring 57
+0%
57
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95
+0%
95
+0%
Metro Exodus 66
+0%
66
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 44
+0%
44
+0%
Valorant 98
+0%
98
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+0%
30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Elden Ring 73
+0%
73
+0%
Far Cry 5 70
+0%
70
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75
+0%
75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+0%
76
+0%
Metro Exodus 45
+0%
45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 29
+0%
29
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 48
+0%
48
+0%
World of Tanks 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 29
+0%
29
+0%
Dota 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 63
+0%
63
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Elden Ring 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
World of Tanks 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Elden Ring 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 22
+0%
22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Dota 2 52
+0%
52
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how GRID M3-3020 and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 181% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 169% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 178% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.69 20.28
Recency 18 May 2016 23 April 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has a 163.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID M3-3020 in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID M3-3020 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
GRID M3-3020
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GRID M3-3020 GRID M3 3020
vs
FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
vs
Radeon 880M Radeon 880M
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3 3020
vs
FirePro W5100 FirePro W5100
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
Jetson AGX Xavier Jetson AGX Xavier
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
RTX 5880 Ada Generation RTX 5880 Ada Generation
RX Vega Mobile Radeon RX Vega Mobile
vs
GTX 1650 GDDR6 GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
RX 560 896SP Radeon RX 560 896SP
vs
RTX 4080 SUPER GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
Quadro P620 Quadro P620
vs
RX 5600 OEM Radeon RX 5600 OEM
RX 550 640SP Radeon RX 550 640SP
vs
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU M2 Max 38-Core GPU
GRID M60-8Q GRID M60 8Q
vs
Quadro P520 Quadro P520
Pro Vega 56 Radeon Pro Vega 56
vs
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
Pro Vega 56 Radeon Pro Vega 56
vs
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
Pro Vega 56 Radeon Pro Vega 56
vs
RTX A5000 RTX A5000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 1 vote

Rate GRID M3-3020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1717 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.