Quadro P620 vs GRID K340

Place in the ranking	775	479
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.04	no data
Power efficiency	0.94	16.17
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	GK107	GP107
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 July 2013 (11 years ago)	1 February 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$3,299	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384 ×4	512
Core clock speed	950 MHz	1177 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1443 MHz
Number of transistors	1,270 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	30.40 ×4	46.18
Floating-point processing power	0.7296 TFLOPS ×4	1.478 TFLOPS
ROPs	8 ×4	16
TMUs	32 ×4	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	145 mm
Width	2-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB ×4	2 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit ×4	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s ×4	96.13 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	3.0	6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

14−16

−236%

47
+236%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

235.64

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Fortnite	113 +0%	113 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Valorant	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Dota 2	90 +0%	90 +0%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Fortnite	42 +0%	42 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Metro Exodus	17 +0%	17 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	32 +0%	32 +0%
Valorant	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Dota 2	83 +0%	83 +0%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 +0%	17 +0%
Valorant	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Valorant	100−105 +0%	100−105 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

18−20

+0%

18−20

+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Valorant	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Dota 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

8−9

+0%

8−9

+0%

This is how GRID K340 and Quadro P620 compete in popular games:

Quadro P620 is 236% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.67	8.19
Recency	23 July 2013	1 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	40 Watt

Quadro P620 has a 206.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 462.5% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P620 is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID K340 in performance tests.