Quadro P500 vs GRID K340

Place in the ranking	817	743
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.02	no data
Power efficiency	0.99	16.85
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	GK107	GP108
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	23 July 2013 (12 years ago)	5 January 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$3,299	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384 ×4	256
Core clock speed	950 MHz	1455 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1518 MHz
Number of transistors	1,270 million	1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	18 Watt
Texture fill rate	30.40 ×4	24.29
Floating-point processing power	0.7296 TFLOPS ×4	0.7772 TFLOPS
ROPs	8 ×4	16
TMUs	32 ×4	16
L1 Cache	32 KB	96 KB
L2 Cache	128 KB	512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB ×4	2 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit ×4	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s ×4	40.1 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	3.0	6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

14−16

−42.9%

20
+42.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

235.64

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Escape from Tarkov	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Far Cry 5	14 +0%	14 +0%
Fortnite	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Valorant	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Dota 2	49 +0%	49 +0%
Escape from Tarkov	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Far Cry 5	12 +0%	12 +0%
Fortnite	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 +0%	14 +0%
Valorant	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Dota 2	45 +0%	45 +0%
Escape from Tarkov	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Far Cry 5	8 +0%	8 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8 +0%	8 +0%
Valorant	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

21−24

+0%

21−24

+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Metro Exodus	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Valorant	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Escape from Tarkov	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

8−9

+0%

8−9

+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Escape from Tarkov	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

4−5

+0%

4−5

+0%

This is how GRID K340 and Quadro P500 compete in popular games:

Quadro P500 is 43% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.89	3.95
Recency	23 July 2013	5 January 2018
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	18 Watt

Quadro P500 has a 36.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1150% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID K340 in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID K340 is a workstation graphics card while Quadro P500 is a mobile workstation one.