NX-SoC vs GRID A100A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGA100GM20B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)17 March 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6912256
Core clock speed900 MHz384 MHz
Boost clock speed1005 MHz768 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate434.212.29
Floating-point processing power13.89 TFLOPS0.3932 TFLOPS
ROPs1928
TMUs43216
Tensor Cores432no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eDDR4
Maximum RAM amount48 GB4 GB
Memory bus width6144 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,866 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.21.1.126
CUDA8.05.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 17 March 2017
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 20 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 15 Watt

GRID A100A has an age advantage of 3 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

NX-SoC, on the other hand, has 2566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID A100A and NX-SoC. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID A100A is a workstation card while NX-SoC is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID A100A
GRID A100A
NVIDIA NX-SoC
NX-SoC

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 9 votes

Rate GRID A100A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate NX-SoC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.