GMA X4500 vs GRID A100A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Generation 5.0 (2008)
GPU code nameGA100Eaglelake
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)1 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores691280
Core clock speed900 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speed1005 MHzno data
Number of transistors54,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate434.22.132
Floating-point processing power13.89 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1924
TMUs4324
Tensor Cores432no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount48 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width6144 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1215 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1,866 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)10.0
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 1 June 2008
Chip lithography 7 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 13 Watt

GRID A100A has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

GMA X4500, on the other hand, has 2976.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID A100A and GMA X4500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID A100A is a workstation graphics card while GMA X4500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID A100A
GRID A100A
Intel GMA X4500
GMA X4500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 9 votes

Rate GRID A100A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 328 votes

Rate GMA X4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.