Jetson TX1 vs FireStream 9370

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking567not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.03no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameCypressGM20B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 June 2010 (14 years ago)4 January 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1600256
Core clock speed825 MHz998 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rate66.0015.97
Floating-point processing power2.64 TFLOPS0.511 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x4
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth147.2 GB/s9.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.0
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1
CUDA-5.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 June 2010 4 January 2015
Chip lithography 40 nm 20 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 6 Watt

Jetson TX1 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 3650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireStream 9370 and Jetson TX1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireStream 9370 is a workstation card while Jetson TX1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FireStream 9370
FireStream 9370
NVIDIA Jetson TX1
Jetson TX1

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 8 votes

Rate FireStream 9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate Jetson TX1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.