UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs FirePro W5130M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W5130M with UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), including specs and performance data.

W5130M
2015
2 GB GDDR5
3.33
+57.1%

W5130M outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking768901
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameTropoTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date2 October 2015 (9 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51216
Core clock speed900 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Texture fill rate29.60no data
Floating-point processing power0.9472 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

W5130M 3.33
+57.1%
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 2.12

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

W5130M 3106
+87.8%
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 1654

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

W5130M 2110
+75.4%
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 1203

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

W5130M 14381
+80.2%
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 7982

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
+127%
11
−127%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−91.7%
23
+91.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+20%
10
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−41.7%
17
+41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+25%
8
−25%
Fortnite 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
−12.5%
9
+12.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Valorant 50−55
+25%
40−45
−25%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+140%
5
−140%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+44.2%
40−45
−44.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Dota 2 30−35
+39.1%
23
−39.1%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+42.9%
7
−42.9%
Fortnite 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11
+66.7%
6
−66.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+11.1%
9
−11.1%
Valorant 50−55
+25%
40−45
−25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Dota 2 30−35
+45.5%
22
−45.5%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+120%
5
−120%
Valorant 50−55
+25%
40−45
−25%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+66.7%
14−16
−66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Valorant 30−35
+100%
16−18
−100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

This is how W5130M and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compete in popular games:

  • W5130M is 127% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the W5130M is 300% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 92% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • W5130M performs better in 52 tests (93%)
  • UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) performs better in 3 tests (5%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.33 2.12
Recency 2 October 2015 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

W5130M has a 57.1% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro W5130M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W5130M is a mobile workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W5130M
FirePro W5130M
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 71 votes

Rate FirePro W5130M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 389 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W5130M or UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.