NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs AMD FirePro W5170M

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

W5170M
5.65

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms FirePro W5170M by 362% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking562190
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.216.16
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameTropoN19E-Q1
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date2 October 2015 (8 years old)27 May 2019 (4 years old)
Current price$1530 $2393
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3000 Mobile has 2833% better value for money than W5170M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401920
Core clock speedno data945 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data80 Watt
Texture fill rate37.00198.7
Floating-point performance1,184 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on FirePro W5170M and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed4500 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+no data
G-SYNC supportno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+no data
VR Readyno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

W5170M 5.65
RTX 3000 Mobile 26.10
+362%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms FirePro W5170M by 362% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

W5170M 2191
RTX 3000 Mobile 10116
+362%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms FirePro W5170M by 362% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

W5170M 4197
RTX 3000 Mobile 19879
+374%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms FirePro W5170M by 374% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

W5170M 2909
RTX 3000 Mobile 14842
+410%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms FirePro W5170M by 410% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

W5170M 19095
RTX 3000 Mobile 91394
+379%

Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms FirePro W5170M by 379% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
−252%
95
+252%
4K18−20
−389%
88
+389%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−378%
40−45
+378%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−600%
77
+600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−667%
45−50
+667%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−394%
80−85
+394%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−306%
65−70
+306%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−378%
40−45
+378%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−467%
65−70
+467%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−600%
91
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−353%
85−90
+353%
Hitman 3 12−14
−508%
75−80
+508%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−409%
55−60
+409%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−320%
40−45
+320%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−614%
100
+614%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−464%
62
+464%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−667%
45−50
+667%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−394%
80−85
+394%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−306%
65−70
+306%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−378%
40−45
+378%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−467%
65−70
+467%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−562%
86
+562%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−353%
85−90
+353%
Hitman 3 12−14
−508%
75−80
+508%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−409%
55−60
+409%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−450%
40−45
+450%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−320%
40−45
+320%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−500%
84
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−627%
109
+627%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−255%
39
+255%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−667%
45−50
+667%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−394%
80−85
+394%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−378%
40−45
+378%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−467%
65−70
+467%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−492%
77
+492%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−353%
85−90
+353%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−367%
56
+367%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Hitman 3 9−10
−389%
40−45
+389%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−192%
35−40
+192%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−550%
24−27
+550%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−600%
27−30
+600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 24−27
Battlefield 5 3−4
−1833%
55−60
+1833%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−467%
16−18
+467%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−750%
50−55
+750%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−575%
50−55
+575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−540%
30−35
+540%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Hitman 3 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
Metro Exodus 0−1 16−18
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1350%
27−30
+1350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−467%
16−18
+467%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−3000%
30−35
+3000%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 7−8
Far Cry 5 5−6
−340%
21−24
+340%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−225%
24−27
+225%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−640%
35−40
+640%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

This is how W5170M and RTX 3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 252% faster than W5170M

4K resolution:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 389% faster than W5170M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3000 Mobile is 3000% faster than the W5170M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3000 Mobile surpassed W5170M in all 65 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 5.65 26.10
Recency 2 October 2015 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W5170M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W5170M
FirePro W5170M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 59 votes

Rate AMD FirePro W5170M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 218 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.