VGA Wonder vs FirePro W4190M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	742	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.02	no data
Architecture	GCN (2011−2017)	Wonder (1986−1992)
GPU code name	Mars XTX?	18800-1
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	12 November 2015 (8 years ago)	5 February 1990 (34 years ago)
Current price	$4205	$268

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	no data
Core clock speed	825 MHz	10 MHz
Boost clock speed	900 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	950 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	800 nm
Texture fill rate	21.60	no data
Floating-point performance	691.2 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro W4190M and VGA Wonder compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCI
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DRAM
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 KB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	32 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	10 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	40 MB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration

+

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	N/A
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	N/A
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	12 November 2015	5 February 1990
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 KB
Chip lithography	28 nm	800 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---