Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs ATI FirePro V7770

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated819
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data25.20
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)no data
GPU code nameRV770no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2012 (12 years ago)6 December 2018 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800no data
Core clock speed625 MHzno data
Number of transistors956 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)76 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate25.00no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length234 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR4no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2.1 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth33.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVIno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 76 Watt 7 Watt

Qualcomm Adreno 685 has a 685.7% more advanced lithography process, and 985.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V7770 and Qualcomm Adreno 685. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V7770 is a workstation card while Qualcomm Adreno 685 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V7770
FirePro V7770
Qualcomm Adreno 685
Adreno 685

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro V7770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 15 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 685 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.