Radeon RX 560X Mobile vs FirePro V5900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A300 A320 V5900 V7900 V7900 SDI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
540 540X 550 Mobile 550X Mobile 560 Mobile 560X Mobile 570 Mobile 570X Mobile 580 Mobile 580X Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro V5900 with Radeon RX 560X Mobile, including specs and performance data.

FirePro V5900
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
2.93

560X Mobile outperforms V5900 by a whopping 236% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FirePro V5900 FirePro V5900
RX 560X Mobile RX 560X Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking811483
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.0111.68
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameCaymanPolaris 21
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date24 May 2011 (14 years ago)11 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121024
Core clock speed600 MHz1275 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1202 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2081.60
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPS2.611 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs3264
L1 Cache128 KB256 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length230 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1450 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s92.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−240%
34
+240%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+0%
17
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Fortnite 66
+0%
66
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+0%
52
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50
+0%
50
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 122
+0%
122
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+0%
15
+0%
Dota 2 71
+0%
71
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Fortnite 44
+0%
44
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 49
+0%
49
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 36
+0%
36
+0%
Metro Exodus 20
+0%
20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 42
+0%
42
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+0%
36
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+0%
13
+0%
Dota 2 66
+0%
66
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 38
+0%
38
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30
+0%
30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 33
+0%
33
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how FirePro V5900 and RX 560X Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 560X Mobile is 240% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.93 9.85
Recency 24 May 2011 11 April 2018
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 65 Watt

RX 560X Mobile has a 236.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 15.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 560X Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V5900 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro V5900 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 560X Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FirePro V5900
FirePro V5900
AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
Radeon RX 560X Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro V5900 FirePro V5900
vs
FX 5800 Quadro FX 5800
RX 560X Mobile Radeon RX 560X Mobile
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
FirePro V5900 FirePro V5900
vs
NVS 810 NVS 810
FirePro V5900 FirePro V5900
vs
HD Graphics 620 620
FirePro V5900 FirePro V5900
vs
R5 240 OEM 240 OEM
FirePro V5900 FirePro V5900
vs
GTX 860M OEM 860M OEM
FirePro V5900 FirePro V5900
vs
Quadro K600 K600
FirePro V5900 FirePro V5900
vs
GTX 260 260
FirePro V5900 FirePro V5900
vs
R9 280X2 280X2
FirePro V7900 FirePro V7900
vs
HD 8760 OEM 8760 OEM
FirePro V7900 FirePro V7900
vs
GT 630 630
FirePro V7900 FirePro V7900
vs
Pro 5600M 5600M
FirePro 2270 FirePro 2270
vs
5000 SDI 5000 SDI

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 54 votes

Rate FirePro V5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 440 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V5900 or Radeon RX 560X Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.