Radeon R5 M430 vs FirePro V3900

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FirePro V3900
2012
1024 MB GDDR3
1.67

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking894892
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.200.04
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code nameTurksMars
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date7 February 2012 (12 years ago)1 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Current price$110 $749

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro V3900 has 400% better value for money than R5 M430.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480320
Core clock speed650 MHz955 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1030 MHz
Number of transistors716 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)199 Wattunknown
Texture fill rate15.6017.10
Floating-point performance624.0 gflops659.2 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on FirePro V3900 and Radeon R5 M430 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorhalf height / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1746 MHz
Memory bandwidth28 GB/s16 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
DisplayPort count1no data
Dual-link DVI support1no data
HD сomponent video output1no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro V3900 1.67
R5 M430 1.67

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FirePro V3900 646
R5 M430 648
+0.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−7.1%
15
+7.1%

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 7 February 2012 1 May 2016
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between FirePro V3900 and Radeon R5 M430.

Be aware that FirePro V3900 is a workstation card while Radeon R5 M430 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V3900
FirePro V3900
AMD Radeon R5 M430
Radeon R5 M430

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 87 votes

Rate FirePro V3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 346 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.