Quadro 500M vs FirePro V3900

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FirePro V3900
2012
1024 MB GDDR3
1.67
+13.6%

FirePro V3900 outperforms Quadro 500M by 14% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking894936
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.200.06
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameTurksGF108
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date7 February 2012 (12 years old)22 February 2011 (13 years old)
Current price$110 $58

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro V3900 has 233% better value for money than Quadro 500M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48096
Core clock speed650 MHz700 MHz
Number of transistors716 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)199 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate15.6011.20
Floating-point performance624.0 gflops268.8 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on FirePro V3900 and Quadro 500M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorhalf height / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth28 GB/s28.8 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
DisplayPort count1no data
Dual-link DVI support1no data
HD сomponent video output1no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDAno data2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro V3900 1.67
+13.6%
Quadro 500M 1.47

FirePro V3900 outperforms Quadro 500M by 14% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FirePro V3900 646
+13.3%
Quadro 500M 570

FirePro V3900 outperforms Quadro 500M by 13% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.67 1.47
Recency 7 February 2012 22 February 2011
Power consumption (TDP) 199 Watt 35 Watt

The FirePro V3900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 500M in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro V3900 is a workstation card while Quadro 500M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V3900
FirePro V3900
NVIDIA Quadro 500M
Quadro 500M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 85 votes

Rate FirePro V3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

This video card has no user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro 500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.