Arc A730M vs FirePro RG220A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated201
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.69
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRV711DG2-512
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 May 2010 (14 years ago)2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores803072
Core clock speed500 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2050 MHz
Number of transistors242 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000393.6
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS12.6 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVIPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 80 Watt

RG220A has 128.6% lower power consumption.

Arc A730M, on the other hand, has a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 816.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro RG220A and Arc A730M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro RG220A is a workstation card while Arc A730M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro RG220A
FirePro RG220A
Intel Arc A730M
Arc A730M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro RG220A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 108 votes

Rate Arc A730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.