Radeon RX 5950 XT vs FirePro M6100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking596not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameEmeraldNavi 21
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2014 (10 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8965120
Core clock speed1100 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1635 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million21,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data350 Watt
Texture fill rate61.60523.2
Floating-point processing power1.971 TFLOPS16.74 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs56320

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5 (6.0)no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.2.170-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

RX 5950 XT has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M6100 and Radeon RX 5950 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M6100 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 5950 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M6100
FirePro M6100
AMD Radeon RX 5950 XT
Radeon RX 5950 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 149 votes

Rate FirePro M6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 35 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5950 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.