FirePro M6100 vs Radeon RX 5500 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5500 XT with FirePro M6100, including specs and performance data.

RX 5500 XT
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
23.71
+332%

RX 5500 XT outperforms FirePro M6100 by a whopping 332% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking215572
Place by popularity82not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.362.76
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code nameNavi 14 XTXBonaire
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date12 December 2019 (4 years ago)1 October 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 no data
Current price$317 (1.9x MSRP)$120

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5500 XT has 457% better value for money than FirePro M6100.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408768
Core clock speed1607 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speed1845 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Wattno data
Texture fill rate162.451.60
Floating-point performanceno data1,651 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 5500 XT and FirePro M6100 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8MXM-B (3.0)
Length180 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s88 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.56.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5500 XT 23.71
+332%
FirePro M6100 5.49

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms FirePro M6100 by 332% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 5500 XT 9155
+331%
FirePro M6100 2122

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms FirePro M6100 by 331% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 5500 XT 19499
+263%
FirePro M6100 5369

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms FirePro M6100 by 263% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 5500 XT 68429
+244%
FirePro M6100 19876

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms FirePro M6100 by 244% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 5500 XT 14305
+273%
FirePro M6100 3837

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms FirePro M6100 by 273% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 5500 XT 86609
+242%
FirePro M6100 25342

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms FirePro M6100 by 242% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

RX 5500 XT 44813
+237%
FirePro M6100 13300

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms FirePro M6100 by 237% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

RX 5500 XT 41927
+147%
FirePro M6100 16951

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms FirePro M6100 by 147% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

RX 5500 XT 61298
+108971%
FirePro M6100 56

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms FirePro M6100 by 108971% in Unigine Heaven 3.0.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 5500 XT 110
+204%
FirePro M6100 36

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms FirePro M6100 by 204% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 5500 XT 122
+111%
FirePro M6100 58

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms FirePro M6100 by 111% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 5500 XT 78
+60.9%
FirePro M6100 49

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms FirePro M6100 by 61% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 5500 XT 105
+153%
FirePro M6100 42

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms FirePro M6100 by 153% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 5500 XT 64
+75%
FirePro M6100 36

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms FirePro M6100 by 75% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 5500 XT 51
+231%
FirePro M6100 15

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms FirePro M6100 by 231% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 5500 XT 78
+199%
FirePro M6100 26

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms FirePro M6100 by 199% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 5500 XT 15
+2417%
FirePro M6100 1

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms FirePro M6100 by 2417% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD74
+23.3%
60
−23.3%
1440p41
+356%
9−10
−356%
4K24
+380%
5−6
−380%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 78 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 72 no data
Battlefield 5 75−80 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 61 no data
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65 no data
Forza Horizon 4 78 no data
Hitman 3 64 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 166 no data
Metro Exodus 132 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 108 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 133 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 74 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 58 no data
Battlefield 5 75−80 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 45 no data
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65 no data
Forza Horizon 4 100−110 no data
Hitman 3 61 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95 no data
Metro Exodus 93 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 88 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 108 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 202 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 49 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 40 no data
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 56 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 87 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 36 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 76 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 67 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 37 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 20 no data
Far Cry 5 60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 41 no data
Hitman 3 36 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 65 no data
Metro Exodus 60 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 66 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 26 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 49 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20 no data
Hitman 3 26 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 22 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 8 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 37 no data
Metro Exodus 31 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 14 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24 no data

This is how RX 5500 XT and FirePro M6100 compete in popular games:

  • RX 5500 XT is 23% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5500 XT is 356% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5500 XT is 380% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.71 5.49
Recency 12 December 2019 1 October 2013
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm

The Radeon RX 5500 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M6100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5500 XT is a desktop card while FirePro M6100 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
Radeon RX 5500 XT
AMD FirePro M6100
FirePro M6100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2613 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 139 votes

Rate FirePro M6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.