T500 Max-Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking835not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.13no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameHaswell GT3eTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date27 May 2013 (12 years ago)2 December 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320896
Core clock speed200 MHz795 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors392 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate48.0079.80
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS2.554 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs4056
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem shared + 128 MB eDRAMGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2013 2 December 2020
Chip lithography 22 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 18 Watt

T500 Max-Q has an age advantage of 7 years, a 83.3% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and T500 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a notebook graphics card while T500 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
NVIDIA T500 Max-Q
T500 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 175 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 17 votes

Rate T500 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or T500 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.