GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 vs FirePro M4000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking683not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.67no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameChelseaG98B
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 June 2012 (12 years ago)3 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5128
Core clock speed675 MHz529 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate21.602.116
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS0.0208 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs324

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Form factorMXM-Ano data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz702 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s11.23 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
StereoOutput3D+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2012 3 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 13 Watt

FirePro M4000 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

9200M GS GDDR3, on the other hand, has 153.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M4000 and GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M4000 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M4000
FirePro M4000
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 39 votes

Rate FirePro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.