A100 SXM4 vs FirePro M3900

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameSeymour XTGA100
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date13 April 2011 (13 years ago)14 May 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$42 $5322

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1606912
Core clock speed700 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHzno data
Number of transistors370 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate6.000609.1
Floating-point performance240 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro M3900 and A100 SXM4 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Form factorchip-downno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2E
Maximum RAM amount1 GB40 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2430 MHz
Memory bandwidth14 GB/s1,555 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDAno data8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 April 2011 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 40 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 400 Watt

We couldn't decide between FirePro M3900 and A100 SXM4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M3900 is a mobile workstation card while A100 SXM4 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M3900
FirePro M3900
NVIDIA A100 SXM4
A100 SXM4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 8 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 175 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.