A100 SXM4 vs FirePro M8900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameBlackcombGA100
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2011 (14 years ago)14 May 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9606912
Core clock speed680 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate32.64609.1
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs32160
TMUs48432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cache192 KB20.3 MB
L2 Cache512 KB40 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Form factorMXM-Bno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2E
Maximum RAM amount2 GB40 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth115 GB/s1,555 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 April 2011 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 40 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 400 Watt

FirePro M8900 has 433.3% lower power consumption.

A100 SXM4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M8900 and A100 SXM4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M8900 is a mobile workstation graphics card while A100 SXM4 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M8900
FirePro M8900
NVIDIA A100 SXM4
A100 SXM4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 10 votes

Rate FirePro M8900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 178 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M8900 or A100 SXM4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.