PG506-232 vs FirePro M3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameSeymourGA100
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date19 October 2010 (15 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1603584
Core clock speed750 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz1440 MHz
Number of transistors370 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate6.000322.6
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS10.32 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8224
Tensor Coresno data224
L1 Cache16 KB10.5 MB
L2 Cache128 KB24 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorchip-downno data
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit3072 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth14 GB/s933.1 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.0N/A
OpenGL4.4N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2010 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 165 Watt

FirePro M3900 has 725% lower power consumption.

PG506-232, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M3900 and PG506-232. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M3900 is a mobile workstation graphics card while PG506-232 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M3900
FirePro M3900
NVIDIA PG506-232
PG506-232

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 13 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate PG506-232 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M3900 or PG506-232, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.