Tesla K80m vs FirePro M3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameSeymourGK210
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date19 October 2010 (15 years ago)17 November 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1602x 2496
Core clock speed750 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz824 MHz
Number of transistors370 million7,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate6.0002x 182.2 billion/sec
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42x 48
TMUs82x 208
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorchip-downno data
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2x 12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2x 384 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth14 GB/s2x 240.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12.0 (11_1)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2010 17 November 2014
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 300 Watt

FirePro M3900 has 1400% lower power consumption.

Tesla K80m, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M3900 and Tesla K80m. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M3900 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Tesla K80m is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 13 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 13 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M3900 or Tesla K80m, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.