GeForce RTX 4090 vs FirePro M2000

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FirePro M2000
2012
1024 MB GDDR5
1.09

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms FirePro M2000 by 9074% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking10441
Place by popularitynot in top-1007
Value for money0.0210.80
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameTurks GLMAD102-300-A1
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 July 2012 (11 years ago)20 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599
Current price$387 $1756 (1.1x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4090 has 53900% better value for money than FirePro M2000.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48016384
Core clock speed500 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Number of transistors716 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate12.001,290
Floating-point performance480.0 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on FirePro M2000 and GeForce RTX 4090 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Form factorchip-downno data
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount1 GB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed3200 MHz21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s1,008 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+
StereoOutput3D1no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDAno data8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro M2000 1.09
RTX 4090 100.00
+9074%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms FirePro M2000 by 9074% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FirePro M2000 424
RTX 4090 38731
+9035%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms FirePro M2000 by 9035% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

FirePro M2000 3956
RTX 4090 137170
+3367%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms FirePro M2000 by 3367% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

FirePro M2000 841
RTX 4090 104937
+12378%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms FirePro M2000 by 12378% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p9
−8789%
800−850
+8789%
Full HD16
−1556%
265
+1556%
1440p2−3
−10500%
212
+10500%
4K1−2
−14900%
150
+14900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7400%
225
+7400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−1878%
170−180
+1878%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7300%
222
+7300%
Hitman 3 1−2
−21800%
210−220
+21800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−27400%
275
+27400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−5967%
180−190
+5967%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−4100%
294
+4100%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−1878%
170−180
+1878%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7033%
214
+7033%
Hitman 3 1−2
−21800%
210−220
+21800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−24900%
250
+24900%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−22500%
226
+22500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−5967%
180−190
+5967%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−4014%
288
+4014%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−14225%
573
+14225%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6900%
210
+6900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−7525%
305
+7525%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−4867%
140−150
+4867%
Hitman 3 4−5
−5225%
210−220
+5225%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2863%
237
+2863%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−5320%
271
+5320%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−15300%
154
+15300%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−9200%
186
+9200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−13300%
268
+13300%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−9500%
95−100
+9500%
Hitman 3 1−2
−12700%
120−130
+12700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−2571%
187
+2571%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 60−65

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 120
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 120
Far Cry 5 3−4
−5667%
173
+5667%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−2800%
145
+2800%

This is how FirePro M2000 and RTX 4090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 is 8789% faster than FirePro M2000 in 900p
  • RTX 4090 is 1556% faster than FirePro M2000 in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 is 10500% faster than FirePro M2000 in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 is 14900% faster than FirePro M2000 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 4090 is 27400% faster than the FirePro M2000.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4090 surpassed FirePro M2000 in all 29 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.09 100.00
Recency 1 July 2012 20 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 450 Watt

The GeForce RTX 4090 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M2000 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4090 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M2000
FirePro M2000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 4090

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate FirePro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 11104 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.