UHD Graphics 620 vs FirePro D500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro D500 with UHD Graphics 620, including specs and performance data.

FirePro D500
2014
3 GB GDDR5, 274 Watt
9.56
+300%

D500 outperforms UHD Graphics 620 by a whopping 300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking470855
Place by popularitynot in top-10032
Power efficiency2.7312.46
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameTahitiKaby Lake GT2
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 January 2014 (11 years ago)1 September 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536192
Core clock speed725 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm++
Power consumption (TDP)274 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate69.6024.00
Floating-point processing power2.227 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs323
TMUs9624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount3 GB32 GB
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1270 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth243.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDIPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
+285%
13
−285%
1440p60−65
+275%
16
−275%
4K30−35
+275%
8
−275%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Sons of the Forest 4
+0%
4
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 7
+0%
7
+0%
Fortnite 22
+0%
22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12
+0%
12
+0%
Sons of the Forest 0−1 0−1
Valorant 40
+0%
40
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3
+0%
3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 37
+0%
37
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 20
+0%
20
+0%
Far Cry 5 6
+0%
6
+0%
Fortnite 8
+0%
8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5
+0%
5
+0%
Metro Exodus 4
+0%
4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10
+0%
10
+0%
Sons of the Forest 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
+0%
6
+0%
Valorant 34
+0%
34
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 18
+0%
18
+0%
Far Cry 5 6
+0%
6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Sons of the Forest 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
+0%
3
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 22
+0%
22
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Sons of the Forest 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how FirePro D500 and UHD Graphics 620 compete in popular games:

  • FirePro D500 is 285% faster in 1080p
  • FirePro D500 is 275% faster in 1440p
  • FirePro D500 is 275% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 53 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.56 2.39
Recency 18 January 2014 1 September 2017
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 274 Watt 15 Watt

FirePro D500 has a 300% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 620, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 966.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1726.7% lower power consumption.

The FirePro D500 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 620 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro D500 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 620 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro D500
FirePro D500
Intel UHD Graphics 620
UHD Graphics 620

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 21 votes

Rate FirePro D500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4949 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro D500 or UHD Graphics 620, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.