GeForce 320M vs FirePro D300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro D300 with GeForce 320M, including specs and performance data.

FirePro D300
2014
2 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
10.08
+1767%

FirePro D300 outperforms GeForce 320M by a whopping 1767% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking4131183
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.51no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GT2xx (2009−2012)
GPU code namePitcairnMCP89
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date18 January 2014 (10 years ago)1 April 2010 (14 years ago)
Current price$260 $408

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro D300 and GeForce 320M have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128032
Core clock speed850 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate68.007.200
Floating-point performance2,176 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro D300 and GeForce 320M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length242 mmno data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed5080 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth162.6 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD220−230
+1733%
12
−1733%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Hitman 3 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
+1718%
10−12
−1718%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+1757%
7−8
−1757%
Watch Dogs: Legion 160−170
+1678%
9−10
−1678%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Hitman 3 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
+1718%
10−12
−1718%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+1757%
7−8
−1757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
Watch Dogs: Legion 160−170
+1678%
9−10
−1678%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
+1718%
10−12
−1718%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+1757%
7−8
−1757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
Watch Dogs: Legion 160−170
+1678%
9−10
−1678%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+1650%
4−5
−1650%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Hitman 3 110−120
+1733%
6−7
−1733%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%

4K
High Preset

Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 70−75
+1650%
4−5
−1650%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%

This is how FirePro D300 and GeForce 320M compete in popular games:

  • FirePro D300 is 1733% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.08 0.54
Recency 18 January 2014 1 April 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 23 Watt

The FirePro D300 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 320M in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro D300 is a workstation card while GeForce 320M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro D300
FirePro D300
NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GeForce 320M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 27 votes

Rate FirePro D300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 50 votes

Rate GeForce 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.