GRID K240Q vs FirePro 2270 1GB Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated565
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.36
Power efficiencyno data2.04
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameCedarGK104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date31 January 2011 (13 years ago)28 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$469

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores801536
Core clock speed600 MHz745 MHz
Number of transistors292 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8095.36
Floating-point processing powerno data2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs8128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.012 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2011 28 June 2013
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 225 Watt

2270 1GB Edition has 1223.5% lower power consumption.

GRID K240Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro 2270 1GB Edition and GRID K240Q. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro 2270 1GB Edition
FirePro 2270 1GB Edition
NVIDIA GRID K240Q
GRID K240Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 319 votes

Rate FirePro 2270 1GB Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GRID K240Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.