Radeon Pro 5300M vs ATI FireGL Z1-128

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated341
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.58
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameR300Navi 14
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date1 October 2002 (22 years ago)13 November 2019 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1280
Core clock speed325 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1250 MHz
Number of transistors110 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data85 Watt
Texture fill rate1.300100.0
Floating-point processing powerno data3.2 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs480

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed310 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.84 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2002 13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 7 nm

Pro 5300M has an age advantage of 17 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireGL Z1-128 and Radeon Pro 5300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireGL Z1-128 is a workstation card while Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FireGL Z1-128
FireGL Z1-128
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL Z1-128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 169 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.