Quadro2 MXR Low Profile vs Edge 3D 3400XL

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataCelsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameNV1NV11 B2
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date30 September 1995 (29 years ago)25 July 2000 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed60 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors1 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology500 nm180 nm
Texture fill rate0.060.8
ROPs14
TMUs14

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIAGP 4x
Length191 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeVRAMSDR
Maximum RAM amount4 MB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed60 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidth480 MB/s2.928 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1.07.0
OpenGLN/A1.2
OpenCLN/AN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 September 1995 25 July 2000
Maximum RAM amount 4 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 500 nm 180 nm

Quadro2 MXR Low Profile has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 177.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Edge 3D 3400XL and Quadro2 MXR Low Profile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Edge 3D 3400XL is a desktop card while Quadro2 MXR Low Profile is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Edge 3D 3400XL
Edge 3D 3400XL
NVIDIA Quadro2 MXR Low Profile
Quadro2 MXR Low Profile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Edge 3D 3400XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Quadro2 MXR Low Profile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.