STG vs Quadro2 MXR Low Profile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)no data
GPU code nameNV11 B2NV1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2000 (24 years ago)30 September 1995 (29 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed200 MHz75 MHz
Number of transistors20 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm500 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data2 Watt
Texture fill rate0.80.08
ROPs41
TMUs41

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRFPM
Maximum RAM amount32 MB1 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed183 MHz50 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.928 GB/s400.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x VGA, 1x DB13W3

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.01.0
OpenGL1.2N/A
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2000 30 September 1995
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 1 MB
Chip lithography 180 nm 500 nm

Quadro2 MXR Low Profile has an age advantage of 4 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 177.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro2 MXR Low Profile and STG. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro2 MXR Low Profile is a workstation graphics card while STG is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro2 MXR Low Profile
Quadro2 MXR Low Profile
NVIDIA STG
STG

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Quadro2 MXR Low Profile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 5 votes

Rate STG on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.