Radeon R9 M485X vs Arc Graphics 140V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Graphics 112EU Mobile Graphics 128EU Mobile Graphics 130T Graphics 130V Graphics 140T Graphics 140V
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
E8950 R9 M295X R9 M295X Mac Edition R9 M390X R9 M395X R9 M395X Mac Edition R9 M485X

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 140V and Radeon R9 M485X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc Graphics 140V
2024
16 GB LPDDR5x
12.65
+42.9%

Arc Graphics 140V outperforms R9 M485X by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
R9 M485X R9 M485X

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking420515
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.62
ArchitectureXe² (2024)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUAmethyst
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)15 May 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82048
Core clock speedno data723 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology3 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data92.54
Floating-point processing powerno data2.961 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 140V 12.65
+42.9%
R9 M485X 8.85

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 140V 5230
+42.9%
R9 M485X 3660

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%
1440p23
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
4K29
+61.1%
18−21
−61.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 87
+85.1%
45−50
−85.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Dead Island 2 45−50
+51.6%
30−35
−51.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+43.6%
35−40
−43.6%
Counter-Strike 2 85
+80.9%
45−50
−80.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Dead Island 2 45−50
+51.6%
30−35
−51.6%
Far Cry 5 52
+79.3%
27−30
−79.3%
Fortnite 70−75
+37%
50−55
−37%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+38.5%
35−40
−38.5%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+43.8%
30−35
−43.8%
Valorant 110−120
+26.4%
85−90
−26.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+43.6%
35−40
−43.6%
Counter-Strike 2 42
−11.9%
45−50
+11.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+30.7%
130−140
−30.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Dead Island 2 45−50
+51.6%
30−35
−51.6%
Far Cry 5 47
+62.1%
27−30
−62.1%
Fortnite 70−75
+37%
50−55
−37%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+38.5%
35−40
−38.5%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+33.3%
30−35
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+43.8%
30−35
−43.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+170%
21−24
−170%
Valorant 110−120
+26.4%
85−90
−26.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+43.6%
35−40
−43.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Dead Island 2 45−50
+51.6%
30−35
−51.6%
Far Cry 5 44
+51.7%
27−30
−51.7%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+38.5%
35−40
−38.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+43.8%
30−35
−43.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+21.7%
21−24
−21.7%
Valorant 110−120
+26.4%
85−90
−26.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
+37%
50−55
−37%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+41.2%
65−70
−41.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 18
+50%
12−14
−50%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+128%
45−50
−128%
Valorant 130−140
+36%
100−105
−36%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+66.7%
21−24
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Dead Island 2 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Far Cry 5 37
+106%
18−20
−106%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+47.4%
18−20
−47.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+20%
20−22
−20%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Valorant 65−70
+50%
45−50
−50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Dead Island 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
High Preset

Dead Island 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how Arc Graphics 140V and R9 M485X compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140V is 48% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Graphics 140V is 44% faster in 1440p
  • Arc Graphics 140V is 61% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 140V is 300% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M485X is 12% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140V is ahead in 61 tests (92%)
  • R9 M485X is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 12.65 8.85
Recency 24 September 2024 15 May 2016
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 3 nm 28 nm

Arc Graphics 140V has a 42.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Graphics 140V is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M485X in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V
AMD Radeon R9 M485X
Radeon R9 M485X
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
R9 M485X Radeon R9 M485X
vs
GT 755M SLI GeForce GT 755M SLI
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
RTX 5050 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile
vs
P650 PCIe
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4000 AGP
vs
Voodoo4 4000 AGP
3dfx Voodoo5 5500 AGP
vs
Voodoo4-2 4000 AGP
RTX 5080 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile
vs
Playstation 2 GPU 250nm
Arc B570 Intel Arc B570
vs
Playstation 5 Pro GPU 5 Pro GPU
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
vs
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
Iris Plus Graphics Intel Iris Plus Graphics
vs
Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 130V
RTX 5070 Ti NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti
vs
RTX 3070 6144SP 3070 6144SP
RX 9060 XT 9060 XT
vs
RTX 3070 6144SP GeForce RTX 3070 6144SP
Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU
vs
Arc B580 Arc B580

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 41 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M485X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 140V or Radeon R9 M485X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.