GeForce GT 740 vs Arc Graphics 140V

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 140V with GeForce GT 740, including specs and performance data.

Arc Graphics 140V
16 GB LPDDR5x
13.07
+249%

Arc Graphics 140V outperforms GT 740 by a whopping 249% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking387712
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.19
Power efficiencyno data4.13
ArchitectureXe² (2025)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUGK107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateno data29 May 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8384
Core clock speedno data993 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology3 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data64 Watt
Texture fill rateno data31.78
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7626 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80.19 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc Graphics 140V 13.07
+249%
GT 740 3.74

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 140V 5159
+249%
GT 740 1477

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc Graphics 140V 9492
+387%
GT 740 1950

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
+300%
10−12
−300%
1440p21
+250%
6−7
−250%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data8.90
1440pno data14.83

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45
+275%
12−14
−275%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+267%
12−14
−267%
Counter-Strike 2 37
+270%
10−11
−270%
Forza Horizon 4 78
+271%
21−24
−271%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+250%
10−11
−250%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+270%
10−11
−270%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+278%
9−10
−278%
Valorant 50−55
+286%
14−16
−286%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+267%
12−14
−267%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+275%
8−9
−275%
Dota 2 44
+267%
12−14
−267%
Far Cry 5 35
+250%
10−11
−250%
Fortnite 75−80
+262%
21−24
−262%
Forza Horizon 4 65
+261%
18−20
−261%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+250%
10−11
−250%
Grand Theft Auto V 43
+258%
12−14
−258%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+270%
10−11
−270%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+267%
27−30
−267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+278%
9−10
−278%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+310%
10−11
−310%
Valorant 50−55
+286%
14−16
−286%
World of Tanks 170−180
+258%
50−55
−258%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+267%
12−14
−267%
Counter-Strike 2 25
+257%
7−8
−257%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+257%
14−16
−257%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+256%
16−18
−256%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+250%
10−11
−250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+267%
27−30
−267%
Valorant 50−55
+286%
14−16
−286%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 18
+260%
5−6
−260%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
World of Tanks 95−100
+252%
27−30
−252%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+286%
7−8
−286%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+263%
8−9
−263%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Valorant 30−35
+267%
9−10
−267%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Dota 2 24−27
+300%
6−7
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+300%
6−7
−300%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+290%
10−11
−290%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+300%
6−7
−300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Fortnite 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Valorant 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%

This is how Arc Graphics 140V and GT 740 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140V is 300% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Graphics 140V is 250% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.07 3.74
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 3 nm 28 nm

Arc Graphics 140V has a 249.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Graphics 140V is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 740 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 140V is a notebook card while GeForce GT 740 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
GeForce GT 740

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 10 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1205 votes

Rate GeForce GT 740 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.