Radeon RX 5700M vs Arc Graphics 140T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 140T and Radeon RX 5700M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc Graphics 140T
2025
12.74
+252%

Graphics 140T outperforms 5700M by a whopping 252% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking406743
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.62
ArchitectureXe+ (2025)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 10
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)1 March 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82304
Core clock speedno data1465 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1720 MHz
Number of transistorsno data10,300 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data180 Watt
Texture fill rateno data247.7
Floating-point processing powerno data7.926 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data144
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 140T 12.74
+252%
RX 5700M 3.62

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 140T 5634
+252%
Samples: 7
RX 5700M 1599

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD46
+283%
12−14
−283%
1440p23
+283%
6−7
−283%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+375%
16−18
−375%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+250%
8−9
−250%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 55−60
+293%
14−16
−293%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+375%
16−18
−375%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+250%
8−9
−250%
Far Cry 5 48
+300%
12−14
−300%
Fortnite 75−80
+255%
21−24
−255%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+200%
18−20
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+330%
10−11
−330%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%
Valorant 110−120
+119%
50−55
−119%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 55−60
+293%
14−16
−293%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+375%
16−18
−375%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+172%
65−70
−172%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+250%
8−9
−250%
Far Cry 5 45
+275%
12−14
−275%
Fortnite 75−80
+255%
21−24
−255%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+200%
18−20
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+330%
10−11
−330%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
+142%
12−14
−142%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+375%
12−14
−375%
Valorant 110−120
+119%
50−55
−119%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+293%
14−16
−293%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+250%
8−9
−250%
Far Cry 5 40
+233%
12−14
−233%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+200%
18−20
−200%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+158%
12−14
−158%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+255%
21−24
−255%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+252%
27−30
−252%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Valorant 140−150
+255%
40−45
−255%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+267%
9−10
−267%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Valorant 75−80
+295%
18−20
−295%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%

Full HD
High

Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how Arc Graphics 140T and RX 5700M compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140T is 283% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Graphics 140T is 283% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 140T is 750% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140T performs better in 53 tests (91%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.74 3.62
Recency 6 January 2025 1 March 2020

Arc Graphics 140T has a 251.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 years.

The Arc Graphics 140T is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5700M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 140T
Arc Graphics 140T
AMD Radeon RX 5700M
Radeon RX 5700M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 23 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 46 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 140T or Radeon RX 5700M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.