Radeon 660M vs Arc Graphics 140T

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 140T and Radeon 660M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc Graphics 140T
2025
13.56
+66.2%

Arc Graphics 140T outperforms 660M by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking390528
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.66
ArchitectureXe+ (2025)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameno dataRembrandt+
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8384
Core clock speedno data1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,100 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data40 Watt
Texture fill rateno data45.60
Floating-point processing powerno data1.459 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24
Ray Tracing Coresno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 140T 13.56
+66.2%
Radeon 660M 8.16

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 140T 5553
+66.2%
Radeon 660M 3341

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc Graphics 140T 12566
+88.9%
Radeon 660M 6652

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Arc Graphics 140T 58039
+154%
Radeon 660M 22854

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc Graphics 140T 9328
+97%
Radeon 660M 4735

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc Graphics 140T 54553
+75%
Radeon 660M 31180

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
+88%
25
−88%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+78.6%
40−45
−78.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+16.7%
24
−16.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+8.7%
23
−8.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+63.9%
35−40
−63.9%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+78.6%
40−45
−78.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+40%
20
−40%
Far Cry 5 48
+60%
30
−60%
Fortnite 75−80
+57.1%
45−50
−57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+58.3%
35−40
−58.3%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+10.3%
39
−10.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+47.1%
17
−47.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+69%
27−30
−69%
Valorant 110−120
+40.2%
80−85
−40.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+63.9%
35−40
−63.9%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+78.6%
40−45
−78.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+46.5%
120−130
−46.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+100%
14
−100%
Far Cry 5 45
+73.1%
26
−73.1%
Fortnite 75−80
+57.1%
45−50
−57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+58.3%
35−40
−58.3%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+34.4%
32
−34.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
+20.8%
24
−20.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+92.3%
13
−92.3%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+86.7%
15
−86.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+69%
27−30
−69%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+44%
25
−44%
Valorant 110−120
+40.2%
80−85
−40.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+63.9%
35−40
−63.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+64.7%
16−18
−64.7%
Far Cry 5 40
+60%
25
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+58.3%
35−40
−58.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+150%
10
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+69%
27−30
−69%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+140%
15
−140%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+57.1%
45−50
−57.1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+62.9%
60−65
−62.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Valorant 140−150
+54.3%
90−95
−54.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+106%
18−20
−106%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+87.5%
16−18
−87.5%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+73.7%
18−20
−73.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+81.8%
10−12
−81.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+31.6%
18−20
−31.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Valorant 70−75
+73.8%
40−45
−73.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 56
+0%
56
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 48
+0%
48
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

This is how Arc Graphics 140T and Radeon 660M compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140T is 88% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 140T is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140T is ahead in 60 tests (91%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.56 8.16
Recency 6 January 2025 3 January 2023

Arc Graphics 140T has a 66.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

The Arc Graphics 140T is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 660M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 140T
Arc Graphics 140T
AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Graphics 140T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 380 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 140T or Radeon 660M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.