RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs Arc Graphics 140T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 140T with RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, including specs and performance data.

Arc Graphics 140T
2025
12.74

PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF outperforms Graphics 140T by a whopping 433% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking40320
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data78.13
ArchitectureXe+ (2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameno dataGB203
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)11 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores88960
Core clock speedno data790 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1337 MHz
Number of transistorsno data45,600 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data374.4
Floating-point processing powerno data23.96 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L1 Cacheno data8.8 MB
L2 Cache8 MB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountno data24 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 140T 12.74
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 67.89
+433%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 140T 5634
Samples: 7
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 30019
+433%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD46
−422%
240−250
+422%
1440p23
−422%
120−130
+422%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
−419%
400−450
+419%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−400%
140−150
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
−420%
130−140
+420%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 55−60
−408%
300−310
+408%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
−419%
400−450
+419%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−400%
140−150
+400%
Far Cry 5 48
−421%
250−260
+421%
Fortnite 75−80
−413%
400−450
+413%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−426%
300−310
+426%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−412%
220−230
+412%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
−420%
130−140
+420%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−420%
260−270
+420%
Valorant 110−120
−417%
600−650
+417%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 55−60
−408%
300−310
+408%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
−419%
400−450
+419%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
−432%
1000−1050
+432%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−400%
140−150
+400%
Far Cry 5 45
−411%
230−240
+411%
Fortnite 75−80
−413%
400−450
+413%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−426%
300−310
+426%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−412%
220−230
+412%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
−417%
150−160
+417%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
−420%
130−140
+420%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−400%
140−150
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−420%
260−270
+420%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
−426%
300−310
+426%
Valorant 110−120
−417%
600−650
+417%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
−408%
300−310
+408%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−400%
140−150
+400%
Far Cry 5 40
−425%
210−220
+425%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−426%
300−310
+426%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
−420%
130−140
+420%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−420%
260−270
+420%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
−416%
160−170
+416%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
−413%
400−450
+413%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−419%
140−150
+419%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
−390%
500−550
+390%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−400%
110−120
+400%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−429%
90−95
+429%
Valorant 140−150
−428%
750−800
+428%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
−426%
200−210
+426%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−400%
150−160
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−415%
170−180
+415%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−400%
100−105
+400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 30−33
−400%
150−160
+400%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−400%
130−140
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−428%
95−100
+428%
Valorant 75−80
−367%
350−400
+367%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−400%
65−70
+400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
−400%
65−70
+400%

This is how Arc Graphics 140T and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is 422% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is 422% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.74 67.89
Recency 6 January 2025 11 August 2025

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF has a 432.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 7 months.

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 140T in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 140T is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 140T
Arc Graphics 140T
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 19 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 140T or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.