Radeon R7 360 vs Arc Graphics 130V

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 130V with Radeon R7 360, including specs and performance data.

Arc Graphics 130V
16 GB LPDDR5x
11.80
+45%

Arc Graphics 130V outperforms R7 360 by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking410517
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.41
Power efficiencyno data5.61
ArchitectureXe² (2025)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUTobago
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release dateno data18 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$109

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7768
Boost clock speed1850 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology3 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data50.40
Floating-point processing powerno data1.613 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data165 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1 x 6-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB2 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data6000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
Number of Eyefinity displaysno data6
HDMI-+
DisplayPort support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
VCE-+
DDMA audiono data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_2DirectX® 12
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-+
Mantle-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc Graphics 130V 11.80
+45%
R7 360 8.14

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 130V 4535
+44.9%
R7 360 3129

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc Graphics 130V 8255
+101%
R7 360 4110

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD32
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.19

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 41
+51.9%
27−30
−51.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+62.5%
24−27
−62.5%
Counter-Strike 2 31
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Forza Horizon 4 71
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Valorant 45−50
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+62.5%
24−27
−62.5%
Counter-Strike 2 28
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Dota 2 41
+51.9%
27−30
−51.9%
Far Cry 5 28
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Fortnite 65−70
+51.1%
45−50
−51.1%
Forza Horizon 4 58
+45%
40−45
−45%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+48.3%
60−65
−48.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
Valorant 45−50
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%
World of Tanks 160−170
+48.2%
110−120
−48.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+62.5%
24−27
−62.5%
Counter-Strike 2 25
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Forza Horizon 4 48
+60%
30−33
−60%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+48.3%
60−65
−48.3%
Valorant 45−50
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
World of Tanks 80−85
+52.7%
55−60
−52.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Valorant 27−30
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Dota 2 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Fortnite 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Valorant 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%

This is how Arc Graphics 130V and R7 360 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 130V is 52% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.80 8.14
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 3 nm 28 nm

Arc Graphics 130V has a 45% higher aggregate performance score, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Graphics 130V is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 360 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 130V is a notebook card while Radeon R7 360 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 130V
AMD Radeon R7 360
Radeon R7 360

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 8 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 674 votes

Rate Radeon R7 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.