ATI Radeon HD 5750 vs Arc Graphics 130V

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 130V with Radeon HD 5750, including specs and performance data.

Arc Graphics 130V
2024
16 GB LPDDR5x
10.02
+284%

Arc Graphics 130V outperforms ATI HD 5750 by a whopping 284% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking425786
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.42
ArchitectureXe² (2024)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUJuniper
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)13 October 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7720
Core clock speedno data700 MHz
Boost clock speed1850 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology3 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data86 Watt
Texture fill rateno data25.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.008 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data178 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB1 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1150 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data73.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_211.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 130V 10.02
+284%
ATI HD 5750 2.61

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 130V 4481
+284%
ATI HD 5750 1168

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc Graphics 130V 8255
+503%
ATI HD 5750 1370

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD31
+288%
8−9
−288%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+286%
7−8
−286%
Counter-Strike 2 51
+325%
12−14
−325%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+286%
7−8
−286%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+300%
12−14
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 47
+292%
12−14
−292%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Far Cry 5 41
+310%
10−11
−310%
Fortnite 60−65
+300%
16−18
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+292%
12−14
−292%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+325%
8−9
−325%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+290%
10−11
−290%
Valorant 95−100
+313%
24−27
−313%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+286%
7−8
−286%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+300%
12−14
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 25
+317%
6−7
−317%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+298%
40−45
−298%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Far Cry 5 37
+311%
9−10
−311%
Fortnite 60−65
+300%
16−18
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+292%
12−14
−292%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+325%
8−9
−325%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
+310%
10−11
−310%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+290%
10−11
−290%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Valorant 95−100
+313%
24−27
−313%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+300%
12−14
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Far Cry 5 33
+313%
8−9
−313%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+292%
12−14
−292%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+290%
10−11
−290%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Valorant 95−100
+313%
24−27
−313%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
+300%
16−18
−300%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+295%
21−24
−295%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+313%
16−18
−313%
Valorant 110−120
+297%
30−33
−297%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+333%
6−7
−333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Valorant 55−60
+314%
14−16
−314%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

This is how Arc Graphics 130V and ATI HD 5750 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 130V is 288% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.02 2.61
Recency 24 September 2024 13 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 3 nm 40 nm

Arc Graphics 130V has a 283.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Graphics 130V is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5750 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 130V is a notebook card while Radeon HD 5750 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 130V
ATI Radeon HD 5750
Radeon HD 5750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 8 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 299 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 130V or Radeon HD 5750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.